Identifying suspicious date ranges is a common task in audit, compliance, and financial data analysis. It involves checking whether key business events—such as purchase orders, invoices, and payments—occur in a logical chronological order or within a specified period of time. With KNIME, you can automate these checks using visual workflows, ensuring consistency across large datasets and helping auditors quickly isolate records that may require further investigation.
A suspicious date range occurs when two or more date fields in a transaction record do not follow a logical or policy-compliant sequence. Examples include payments recorded before purchase orders, invoices dated after their payment, or unusually long gaps between approval and settlement. Detecting these inconsistencies helps ensure data accuracy and adherence to established business rules.
Irregular date relationships can indicate data entry errors, process weaknesses, or potential fraud. Identifying them early allows internal audit and finance teams to verify transactions, correct records, ensure policy enforcement and strengthen controls. Consistent monitoring also supports compliance requirements and reduces the risk of financial misstatements.
Import datasets such as purchase orders, invoices, and payment records into KNIME directly from SAP, Oracle, Snowflake, ERP systems, Excel, or CSV. Explore the data using summary statistics to identify gaps in the data, min-max values, standard deviation, etc. Leverage date&time and data manipulation nodes to unify inconsistent date formats, correct time zones, and fill in missing or invalid entries to ensure reliable comparisons.
Define custom logic using data manipulation nodes (e.g., Rule Engine, Expression or Math Formula) to perform data validation tests according to different data types (e.g., strings, numbers, date&time, etc.) and spot irregularities (e.g., when a payment date format is invalid, the purchase order is missing, or the invoice amount is above a set threshold). Perform range and cross-record checks using joins, flow variables, or lookup tables, and flag suspicious entries with a clear risk status or descriptive tags.
Display flagged transactions in interactive dashboards or share results as a static report for easy review. Allow analysts to annotate or add investigation notes. Schedule execution via KNIME Hub, integrating seamlessly with systems such as SAP, Oracle, Excel, or audit platforms. Maintain continuous monitoring to automatically trigger alerts or escalate high-risk cases, ensuring proactive detection and timely response.
This example workflow displays how to identify potentially suspicious activities by analyzing the chronological order of transaction events, such as discrepancies between purchase order and payment dates. It includes:
A guide for auditors who are familiar with ACL and IDEA and are ready to explore KNIME Analytics Platform.
Learn how each audit test in the KNIME Audit Starter Pack helps you identify risks, automate analysis, and improve audit efficiency.
Yes, you can chain rule logic using the Rule Engine or Expression nodes. For example, you may flag if invoice_date < order_date OR payment_date < invoice_date OR payment_date > order_date.
Use the Missing Value node or condition logic in the Expression or Rule Engine nodes to explicitly handle missing or empty values (e.g., treat missing dates as “needs review” rather than silently passing).
Yes. The process can be automated to let the workflow write the output (flagged records) to databases or audit platforms on a schedule, or trigger alert emails using one of KNIME’s paid plans.
Because KNIME adopts a visual programming-based paradigm, each rule, node output and branch is inspectable. You can add columns capturing which rule triggered the flag (e.g. “Rule 1: payment < order_date”) and version different copies of the workflow to ensure traceability.